That's not really true. Your objects and photos have a history of functionality but you're repurposing them as stand-alone works. Whereas when a software writer says "the code for this [fill in the blank] program should be declared a work of art," he or she is usually just looking for extra validation, above and beyond a job well done.
- tom moody 6-11-2001 10:15 pm


The machines as sculpture are functional. The photos are a little more removed but I consider information exchange (reading photos for their content instead of their esthetics) is also functional. But enough about me, it doesn't realy relate to the original post.


- bill 6-12-2001 2:23 am [add a comment]





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.