quiet
*double drat*

fink ** tree
archive ** portal

listening:

watching:

reading, riting & rithmaticking:

tasting:
alias

leering:

going:
to hell in a handbasket


mixmedia: all movie all music c-files portal elbo.ws flickr hype machine imdb kcrw myspace facebook pitchfork tcm hitfix tv tattle wfmu youtube
nets: abc bbc c-span cbs cnet cnn espn msnbc npr pbs
news: asia times boston globe cs monitor financial times guardian haaretz k-ridder la times ny dailynews ny newsday ny post ny times village voice washington post usa today
ref: amazon citysearch craigslist ebay bartleby wikipedia
scitech: digg eureka gizmodo lifehacker nat'l geog new scientist sci daily wired
wires: alternet google memeorandum my antiwar political wire rawstory yahoo
zines: counterpunch economist harpers nation new yorker ny mag ny observer nyr books salon slate tnr time vanity fair

blogs: americablog boing crooks and liars daily kos eschaton firedoglake huffington post hullabaloo jesus general metafilter thinkprogress tpm glenn greenwald wolcott

View current page
...more recent posts

in a rational world, scott ritter would be receiving medals instead of signing books at middle schools and doing interviews in alt-weeklies. the only thing hes said of late that was acknowledged by the corporate mediasphere was his criticism of the anti-war movement. im sure cindy sheehans tactics are of much more concern than the us global hegemon.

That’s why when I speak of Iran, I say be careful of falling into the trap of nonproliferation, disarmament, weapons of mass destruction; this is a smokescreen. The Bush administration does not have policy of disarmament vis-à-vis Iran. They do have a policy of regime change. If we had a policy of disarmament, we would have engaged in unilateral or bilateral discussions with the Iranians a long time ago. But we put that off the table because we have no desire to resolve the situation we use to facilitate the military intervention necessary to achieve regime change. It’s the exact replay of the game plan used for Iraq, where we didn’t care what Saddam did, what he said, what the weapons inspectors found. We created the perception of a noncompliant Iraq, and we stuck with that perception, selling that perception until we achieved our ultimate objective, which was invasion that got rid of Saddam. With Iran, we are creating the perception of a noncompliant Iran, a threatening Iran. It doesn’t matter what the facts are. Now that we have successfully created that perception, the Bush administration will move forward aggressively until it achieves its ultimate objective, which is regime change.

- dave 4-20-2006 3:24 pm [link] [add a comment]

cheney of fools

Yet, despite the fact that hundreds of thousands of words have been written on Cheney’s role in the Bush administration, most of what’s been written fails to explain how the vice president wields his extraordinary authority. Notoriously opaque, the Office of the Vice President (OVP) is very difficult for journalists to penetrate. But a Prospect investigation shows that the key to Cheney’s influence lies with the corps of hard-line acolytes he assembled in 2001. They serve not only as his eyes and ears, monitoring a federal bureaucracy that resists many of Cheney’s pet initiatives, but sometimes serve as his fists, too, when the man from Wyoming feels that the passive-aggressive bureaucrats need bullying. Like disciplined Bolsheviks slicing through a fractious opposition, Cheney’s team operates with a single-minded, ideological focus on the exercise of American military power, a belief in the untrammeled power of the presidency, and a fierce penchant for secrecy.

- dave 4-19-2006 6:55 pm [link] [add a comment]

drat, drat and double drat
- dave 4-19-2006 4:29 am [link] [1 ref] [1 comment]



[home] [subscribe] [login]
drat, drat and double drat!