Looks like sales of camera phones have outpaced the sales of digital cameras in the first half of '03.
I've been saying this for a long time: the stand alone consumer camera market is doomed. But the handset manufactures still have some progress to make. We're starting to see 1 megapixel units, but we need at least twice that resolution. And, more importantly, we need on the fly variable jpeg compression. I mean: each time you snap a picture you should produce two images. One full size image that gets stored in your phone (and synched to your PC later by bluetooth or cable,) and one smaller (the user can select a target size, say, between 20K and 200K) reduced quality image that can be emailed (or sent via mms) right from the phone immediately. I think this is key. So far I know of no one doing this.
That would be great. In fact I don't really see the point if the pics aren't both high-res and email-able. (still, my next phone will be a camera regardless)
|
I've been saying this for a long time: the stand alone consumer camera market is doomed. But the handset manufactures still have some progress to make. We're starting to see 1 megapixel units, but we need at least twice that resolution. And, more importantly, we need on the fly variable jpeg compression. I mean: each time you snap a picture you should produce two images. One full size image that gets stored in your phone (and synched to your PC later by bluetooth or cable,) and one smaller (the user can select a target size, say, between 20K and 200K) reduced quality image that can be emailed (or sent via mms) right from the phone immediately. I think this is key. So far I know of no one doing this.
- jim 9-22-2003 7:35 pm
That would be great. In fact I don't really see the point if the pics aren't both high-res and email-able. (still, my next phone will be a camera regardless)
- steve 9-24-2003 6:36 am