Omigod I love Wikipedia. Somebody uploaded this gorgeous gif of their own MRI scan.
Here's some more nice brains:
Listening to Vilayanur S Ramachandran has got me looking for pictures of grey matter. His lecture on art, that I quoted earlier, was okay, but his stuff on "self" and his bizarre case studies (a la Oliver Sacks) are fabulous. He's extreme in his physiological outlook. Here's a quote:What exactly do people mean when they speak of the self? Its defining characteristics are fourfold. First of all, continuity. You've a sense of time, a sense of past, a sense of future. There seems to be a thread running through your personality, through your mind. Second, closely related is the idea of unity or coherence of self. In spite of the diversity of sensory experiences, memories, beliefs and thoughts, you experience yourself as one person, as a unity.
So there's continuity, there's unity. And then there's the sense of embodiment or ownership - yourself as anchored to your body. And fourth is a sense of agency, what we call free will, your sense of being in charge of your own destiny. I moved my finger.
Now as we've seen in my lectures so far, these different aspects of self can be differentially disturbed in brain disease, which leads me to believe that the self really isn't one thing, but many. Just like love or happiness, we have one word but it's actually lumping together many different phenomena. For example, if I stimulate your right parietal cortex with an electrode (you're conscious and awake) you will momentarily feel that you are floating near the ceiling watching your own body down below. You have an out-of-the-body experience. The embodiment of self is abandoned. One of the axiomatic foundations of your Self is temporarily abandoned. And this is true of each of those aspects of self I was talking about. They can be selectively affected in brain disease.
Inline with these brainy speculations would be the thoughts of Sir Rodger Penrose.
I heard that Penrose had a good take on brains, but I haven't read it yet. Any quotes/details/thoughts George?
I, too, love the Wikipedia. It would be very easy to start contributing and become addicted. I have already found holes I wanted to fill... Brains are good, too, of course.
I used to levitate.
...then what happened? (by the way, L.M., if you get the urge to bust in with any cardinal proto-pope updates feel free)
|
Omigod I love Wikipedia. Somebody uploaded this gorgeous gif of their own MRI scan.
Here's some more nice brains:
Listening to Vilayanur S Ramachandran has got me looking for pictures of grey matter. His lecture on art, that I quoted earlier, was okay, but his stuff on "self" and his bizarre case studies (a la Oliver Sacks) are fabulous. He's extreme in his physiological outlook. Here's a quote:
- sally mckay 4-17-2005 10:31 pm
Inline with these brainy speculations would be the thoughts of Sir Rodger Penrose.
- George (guest) 4-18-2005 6:20 am
I heard that Penrose had a good take on brains, but I haven't read it yet. Any quotes/details/thoughts George?
- sally mckay 4-18-2005 7:34 am
I, too, love the Wikipedia. It would be very easy to start contributing and become addicted. I have already found holes I wanted to fill... Brains are good, too, of course.
- KS 4-18-2005 5:51 pm
I used to levitate.
- L.M. 4-18-2005 6:40 pm
...then what happened? (by the way, L.M., if you get the urge to bust in with any cardinal proto-pope updates feel free)
- sally mckay 4-18-2005 8:17 pm