here's my one-line-list review of "What the Bleep Do We Know." (thanks to Joester for the idea)
- More gratuitous graphic cheeze than Brian Greene's PBS wank-doc on string theory.
- I wish they would've told us up front that the blond pundit was channelling somebody else.
- This film had as much integrity as a chiropractor talking about how the uncertainty principle means you can change reality with your mind.
- I learned that a lot of basketballs is a "field" whereas just one basketball is a "particle."
- I would've found the extended wedding party dance interlude with cute animated characters representing human cells under the chemical influence of love extremely tedious, but I stopped watching at that point and skipped to the final credits, which was the first place any of the so called "experts" who'd been spouting off all movie were identified on screen.
UPDATE: point of clarification: this is not a prereview. We actually watched it. ow. ow. ow.
I watched it at the house of picture shows. Ow, indeed.
The real problem is that a stinker like this could kill the limited market for this genre.
hopefully a few people will retain enough enthusiasm to come to this at the end of May.
|
here's my one-line-list review of "What the Bleep Do We Know." (thanks to Joester for the idea)
- More gratuitous graphic cheeze than Brian Greene's PBS wank-doc on string theory.
- I wish they would've told us up front that the blond pundit was channelling somebody else.
- This film had as much integrity as a chiropractor talking about how the uncertainty principle means you can change reality with your mind.
- I learned that a lot of basketballs is a "field" whereas just one basketball is a "particle."
- I would've found the extended wedding party dance interlude with cute animated characters representing human cells under the chemical influence of love extremely tedious, but I stopped watching at that point and skipped to the final credits, which was the first place any of the so called "experts" who'd been spouting off all movie were identified on screen.
UPDATE: point of clarification: this is not a prereview. We actually watched it. ow. ow. ow.- sally mckay 4-25-2005 9:42 pm
I watched it at the house of picture shows. Ow, indeed.
The real problem is that a stinker like this could kill the limited market for this genre.
- mark 4-26-2005 10:23 pm
hopefully a few people will retain enough enthusiasm to come to this at the end of May.
- sally mckay 4-26-2005 10:48 pm