|
Lorna Mills and Sally McKay
Digital Media Tree this blog's archive OVVLvverk Lorna Mills: Artworks / Persona Volare / contact Sally McKay: GIFS / cv and contact |
View current page
...more recent posts
Sticker by Swintak
I am a Sol LeWitt fan. Last night at the opening for AGO's Swing Space, I got stickered by Swintak. Swing Space is the AGO's smart strategy for programming during massive renovations. The focus is on contemporary art, and the shows on right now are pretty good. Swintak had Lawrence Weiner fan stickers too. All three were showing together as part of the ongoing project Wallworks (*see note below), in which artists work directly on the walls. Like a lot of artists my age, LeWitt and Weiner (and Ed Ruscha, who at least had a bloody sense of humour) opened the door for me to contemporary art. But that's not to say they should be revered in perpetuity. Swintak, a smart young Canadian performance and installation artist, outshines both these "forefathers of conceptual art" (as curator David Moos described them). LeWitt's piece—a big swooshy rainbow stripe painting, more reminiscent of Frank Stella than of LeWitt's signature ethereal grids—spanned all four walls of the gift shop. Weiner's text filled a wall in the room adjacent to the gift shop. Classic Weiner, instructions for installation had been gifted by the previous owners, and rendered by AGO staff with, surprisingly, a fair amount of input from Weiner himself about paint colours and so forth. The text said something about chains holding together and/or breaking apart ... I didn't transcribe it. Swintak's piece was on the opposite wall, framing the doorway to the gift shop. Yes the gift shop was rather prominent but, in it's nomadic reno-incarnation, just a shadow of its former venerable self.
C. A. Swintak, The thing that won't let you walk away, 2005. Taken from AGO website.
At first glance, Swintak's piece looked like old-style (Rauschenberg) assemblage, ie: just a bunch of random junk stuck to the wall. But this messed up recreation of daily life clutter is doubled, one side a mirror of the other. Blue jeans and socks cascade from under a bed with rumbled sheets. Newspapers, dirty dishes, crumpled panties and dust balls are reflected in perfect symmetry. It's like a digital image, except it's all real stuff, glued to the wall. Swintak's level of detail is good. Every inch, from the empty beer can frieze to the lacy, ladies' slip-covered columns is considered and duplicated. Beyond the elegant non-illusion of reflection, the work reads as a personal portrait (or self portrait), with possible (subtle) feminist reading. The woman to whom this clutter belongs is undeniably a blue jeans girl, but she also owns a pair of red high-heeled shoes with matching underwear. She isn't fussy, she drinks beer, she reads the paper. She doesn't sweep her clutter under the rug, in fact, she'll even put it on display. Juxtaposed against Weiner and LeWitt, this piece is full of life and female agency. I really like the AGO's decision to mix it up. Weiner and LeWitt have been dragged out of history into an engagement with Swintak's contemporary take on conceptual art. Swintak is given a dose of high-profile respect, and her bright, grounded practice can handle it.
*NB: Wallworks started with Weiner, LeWitt and Swintak, whose works are all shown in proximity, but the project is ongoing and according to AGO PR will result in 20 pieces over the next 2 years. Raymond Pettibon also had a piece installed last night which I completely misread. It's about surfing dudes. I'm sooo not a California girl... I thought the big blue wave was supposed to be sky, that the reference to "curls" meant nice hair, and that the floating heads were angels of people who'd died from AIDS. Some days I should not be allowed out of the house. UPDATE: Sarah Milroy on Rayond Pettibon here
Get this: I've been given the assignment (by FUSE magazine) of writing a review of the proceedings of an artist-run centre conference...and I'm really looking forward to it. The book just came in the mail, I've skimmed it and I'm raring to go. It's called Off Printing: Situating Publishing Practices in Artist-run Centres (or in French, Tiré à part: situer les practique d'édition des centres d'artistes). For those other nerds out there who can't live without this book, there is an order form available here at the RCAAQ website. It costs $28.
Normally I'd leave critiquing art gallery PR to Simpleposie, but YYZ's "ScenoArt" poster insert thingy is totally absurd! I saw the show, by Sue Gallagher and Andrew King, and it wasn't a spoof. I quite liked Sue Gallagher's piece, in which scenes from old films with dancing couples are split horizontally and reflected, so it looks like the dancers are spinning around neck-deep in a glassy pool. Anyhow, I really want to point out the poster. It's in all caps, for starters. One side is devoted to surreal vision statements from the curator (also a YYZ board member), complete with three claims of ownership and one statement of copyright, and accolades from what appears to be her professor from school (I hope I'm wrong about that). The other side is devoted to the artists, which amounts to their bios and statements blown up in big fonts with weird spacey typesetting and a statement from the curator/board member saying, "Are we not compelled to look for the ones that reflect us and our own work best?" Luckily for those not on the YYZ mailing list, the whole thing is online, typography and all, at www.scenoart.ca. Hooray!
Also mysterious: NOW magazine spelled "penis" as "penus" in today's letters section, both in print and online. Did they do it on purpose?
I've posted a new review here, about Melissa Doherty's recent show at Red Head Gallery, and Roberta McNaughton's current show at Katharine Mulherin Contemporary Art Projects.
video still from Utopics Video Guide by Geoffrey Pugen
I was very taken with Geoffrey Pugen's video in the current project room show at MOCCA, Future Species: Hybrids. Some of the themes, physical fitness and physiological recomposition, remind me of an early Kristin Lucas video, Watch out for Invisible Ghosts. The dancers with animal heads are really great, and Pugen morphs video to good effect, creating spooky/cute post-human monsters (with more narrative content than Kevin Krivel and David Warne). And today I am in love with the internet again because...you can see the video online!
video still from Utopics Video Guide by Geoffrey Pugen
Tiger-mask photo courtesy of Bunnie (They're grrrrreat!)
I just posted a review here about the show Regarding the Pain of Susan Sontag (Notes on Camp) by Jean-Paul Kelly, Steve Reinke, and Anne Walk (Gallery TPW).
Tom Moody, Chris Ashley, jimpunk and abe linkoln were asked to participate as guest artist-bloggers on an academic listserv called empyre. The discussion quickly devolved into a catty battle about lists versus blogs. You can read the empyre debate (described by Bill as the "smouldering wreckage of a panel discussion") here, and the consequent 70-comment thread on Tom Moody's blog here. Very fractious.
Each has a very different raison d'être. Lists are for people with a specific interest to focus discussion on that area of expertise. Technical terms and advanced positions are a-okay, and it is refreshing for participants to assume a certain level of education in the topic area. Listservs are perceived to be more democratic than blogs, as the content is generated by multiple participants. Blogs on the other hand are written with the whole world as a potential, invisible readership. Posts tend to be in plain language, and threads are moderated by the blogger with an eye for the general, uinitiated reader. Blogs also have fewer technical barriers to participation. You don't need a client software, and you don't need to 'join'.
Personally, I am increasingly bugged and put off by the one-voice heirarchy of my own blog. But I like the default attention to audience, and I like playing a small role in the self-organising blogosphere. I also find the general level of respect for other posters/readers is higher here that it is on the listserv I belong to, where discussion frequently devolves into myopic misunderstandings, personal rants, and mean-spirited quips. The upside of the list is that, along with the crabbiness, there's wacks of informed people dropping good info into the pot.
Does anyone know of any successful hybrid examples where bloggers and lists have come together to share content (as opposed to meta-babble about the mode of delivery)?
Megan Williams over at cbc.ca/arts does a nice job describing Rebecca Belmore's installation, called Fountain, at the Venice Biennale. Sounds great!
   |
I'm going on vacation to a strange environment called the forest that doesn't have any telephone lines or wireless hubs. I am coming back sometime around June 11th, likely armed with jpegs of green leafy things and insects. Til then....
