|
Lorna Mills and Sally McKay
Digital Media Tree this blog's archive OVVLvverk Lorna Mills: Artworks / Persona Volare / contact Sally McKay: GIFS / cv and contact |
View current page
...more recent posts
 |  |
|
Art meets science in Damien Hirst's new show at Gagosian in New York, which I haven't seen. The image on the left is the original photo, the right is Hirst's painting (painted by a roster of assistants with some input from Hirst himself.) A press release at Science Photo Library says: "The paintings signal a new direction in [Hirst's] work - that of photorealism. Photorealism was an invention of the 1960s. Take a photograph, and copy it meticulously, until your painting and the photograph are indistinguishable. From a distance Hirst's paintings look like photographs. But close up you can see that they have all been executed using oil paint and brushes." ...and... "We do occasionally licence our images to artists who want to use them for source material. But until you see the finished artwork, we never know how close to the original photograph it will be. The look and feel of the Hirst's oil paintings is different from the original photographs, although the image itself is almost facsimile reproduction." Michael Kimmelman said in NY Times (available here) "[Hirst's paintings] arrive amid a booming youth market, as shallow and money-obsessed as Mr. Hirst, and just as enamored of fashion, but with a higher premium placed on solo handicraft and earnestness or at least on the appearance of it." David Cohen at artcritical.com says: "If you want to see Mr. Hirst’s careeer in terms of iconoclasm, you could say that by producing 31 dutiful, soporific canvases he has delivered a fatal overdose to painting more decisive than the assassination attempt of his pickled shark. But Mr. Hirst isn’t really an iconoclast. For all his razzmatazz and buffoonery, he is in deadly earnest about the power of images." | |
I've been invited to do a guest questionnaire over at Simpleposie. Survey's up!
Welcome to Clog, a cut below the average blog
Well, it has to happen soon or later, former guest poster Joester has started a blog of his own. Don't miss his inaugural post on the "sometimes snack" and spirituality bracelets.
Thanks to everyone who came out to the Qualia Street Closing Party and Von Bark Lecture last night. It was fun fun fun. You guys are great. Also apologies... I forgot to bring down the very important candies! After we made a special trip to the Bay and everything. Next time.
 |  |
here's my one-line-list review of "What the Bleep Do We Know." (thanks to Joester for the idea)
- More gratuitous graphic cheeze than Brian Greene's PBS wank-doc on string theory.
- I wish they would've told us up front that the blond pundit was channelling somebody else.
- This film had as much integrity as a chiropractor talking about how the uncertainty principle means you can change reality with your mind.
- I learned that a lot of basketballs is a "field" whereas just one basketball is a "particle."
- I would've found the extended wedding party dance interlude with cute animated characters representing human cells under the chemical influence of love extremely tedious, but I stopped watching at that point and skipped to the final credits, which was the first place any of the so called "experts" who'd been spouting off all movie were identified on screen.