|
Lorna Mills and Sally McKay
Digital Media Tree this blog's archive OVVLvverk Lorna Mills: Artworks / Persona Volare / contact Sally McKay: GIFS / cv and contact |
View current page
...more recent posts
"...what is important about science is not its authority, but the existence of a community of people more or less committed to such an ethic. To communicate this we have to present ourselves as people and tell stories. Moreover, we have to make some effort to tell true stories, not just the ones that put us in the best light." - Lee Smolin in conversation with Julian Barbour
Holy toy-hack batman! Toronto artist Veronica Verkley created the animated puppet for Rhinocerous Eyes. The film looks like it's going to be great. The website has a page of reviews by neuroscientists! For example Antonio Damasio, Head of Neurology at the University of Iowa, says, “Our mind is made of props — body parts in action, parts of objects, parts of places — all joined in narrative animation. Of course, so are the movies, those creative imitators of the human mind. Rhinoceros Eyes plays with this natural metaphor and blurs the line that divides reality from dream. A most disquieting game."
Verkley's puppets are on display in the window at Pages bookstore until March 31st. Broken dolls, mangled plastic airplanes and many other bits and bobs, conglomerated in a lifesized puppet monster! The creature reminds me of Body Worlds. Can't wait to see the film.
image from here
Rob at Endless Parade of Excellence posted a link to this great profile of Ivor Cutler who died recently. I've posted about Cutler before. He defied conformity in every sense of the word, a strange old Jewish Scot, an oblique story teller, as funny as he was dour, and utterly brilliant.
This from today's Globe and Mail:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has imposed central control over all information and comments to the public issued by government officials and even cabinet ministers, directing them to have everything cleared by the Prime Minister's Office, according to an internal e-mail and government sources....those five points being " Federal Accountability Act, a GST cut, a child-care allowance, tougher criminal sentences, and a patient waiting-times guarantee." I guess the PM wants to be the only person to talk about Afghanistan:
The orders, described in an e-mail to bureaucrats, indicate that ministers have been told to avoid talking about the direction of the government, and that the government wants them to be less accessible to the news media. And all government officials are instructed to avoid speaking about anything other than the five priorities outlined in the Conservative campaign.
Before its liberation, under the Taliban regime, Afghanistan often served as an incubator for Al Qaeda and other terror organizations....yike...Baby Bush alert!
This reality hit home with brutal force on 9-11, when two dozen Canadians lost their lives suddenly and senselessly in the destruction of the World Trade Centre.
Those were ordinary Canadians. People with families, partners, children and dreams for a better future. Just like all of our citizens, people who died suddenly and for no reason at the hands of fanatics.
Since that time, Al Qaeda has singled out Canada as one of the countries targeted for terror.
And beyond the threat of terror there’s the threat of drugs.
NOTE: There is an informative thread at rabble.ca about our troops in Afghanistan, our relationship with USA in this matter, and international law.
A friend of mine recently posed the question: are Canadian soldiers handing Afghani prisoners over to US military? And if yes, is the US military adhering to the Geneva Convention? And if no, or even maybe not, then how can we demand for the protections of Geneva for our soldiers? To my mind, this gets to the heart of the phrase "support our troops." I am looking for discussion of this question on blogs or in the media. Any links would be appreciated.
Jennifer McMackon has posted a considered, critical (in two senses of the word) review of Quantal Strife at Simpleposie. Her review and my response are here. I have also posted a brief response to Peter Goddard's Toronto Star review here (scroll down).