|
Lorna Mills and Sally McKay
Digital Media Tree this blog's archive OVVLvverk Lorna Mills: Artworks / Persona Volare / contact Sally McKay: GIFS / cv and contact |
View current page
...more recent posts
I'm biased because I worked on Caught in the Act in my recent position as interim managing editor at YYZ Books. It's massive, with tons of pictures and profiles. The level of detail is astounding, and if you are looking for contemporary Canadian art context this will give it to you. (I think it was working on this book that kick-started me on my recent-art-history binge...for better or worse!) Editors Johanna Householder and Tanya Mars are indefatiguable, and their hard work gave this landmark book the gift of life. Of course Zab, the designer, went beyond the call and Rob Labossiere, the new managing editor at YYZ, did a bunch of hard work to get it out in time. Here's what YYZ has to say...
Please join us for the launch of this important new title from YYZ Books:
Caught in the Act
an anthology of performance art by Canadian women
Edited by Tanya Mars and Johanna Householder
Thursday, December 16, 7 – 9 p.m.
at YYZ Artists’ Outlet
401 Richmond Street, Suite 140, 416.598.4546
Canada’s definitive book on Canadian women in performance art, this indispensible anthology gives readers access to an important and under-recognized subject in recent Canadian art history. Edited by two seminal Canadian peformance artists, Tanya Mars and Johanna Householder, this book focuses on the 70s and 80s; a time when women made a big and noisy impact, and provides readers with insight into the profound effects that feminism and women’s work have had on the current alternative scene. Full of sass and insight, this essential collection is part survey, part critical discourse, and part reference book, containing five critical essays, thirty-four profiles on individual artists, hundreds of images, and an extensive bibliography.
444 pp. , 219 b/w photos, 19 colour plates
ISBN: 0-920397- 84-0 (softcover) $39.95
YYZ Books is online at www.yyzartistsoutlet.org
YYZ Books is distributed by ABC Art Books Canada at www.abcartbookscanada.com
The support of the Canada Council for the Arts in making this book possible is gratefully acknowledged.
 Paterson Ewen, Northern Lights, 1973 (taken from AGO website) | "According to Paterson Ewen only one of his paintings comes from a direct experience -- that of seeing the aurora borealis while snoeshowing in Algonquin Park. And yet that painting, Northern Lights, with the earth seen from space and the land mass of Canada occupying a disproportionate area of the globe, can hardly be said to be a painting of direct experience." - Philip Monk, Phenomena: Paterson Ewen Paintings 1971-19987, exhibition catalogue, (Toronto: Art Gallery of Ontario, 1988), p. 22 |
| Puttering around through old magazines at the library, I found a hard-copy thread of 80s art criticism, controversy and intrigue. Here's the short version: Philip Monk curated a show by Canadian artist Paterson Ewen in 1988, and wrote a catalogue essay that focussed on the semiotic and material aspects of Ewen's work, referring to a number of American artists such as Robert Smithson, Jackson Pollock, Richard Serra and Robert Morris. Canadian artists Greg Curnoe and Andy Patton took great offense to Monk's approach and wrote scathing responses that were printed together in Parachute, summer of 1989. Curnoe accused Monk of "sanitized and a-historical writing," which held Paterson Ewen up to "imagined international criteria," neglecting the "real context of his work and ideas." Patton suggested that Monk was "groping for coherence and literacy at the expense of one of Canada's major painters." Monk responded in the following issue of Parachute, "...I feel that this demand for history and context, rather than letting the work stand in its own right, is an unconsciously envious attempt by Curnoe and Patton to diminish the achievements of Ewen's art." Pretty darn shirty all round! Yet I am really very curious about the larger context. As LM mentioned recently in another thread, the 80s were full of "tyrannical art ideologies." But despite all the emotional lashing out, each piece contains great historical detail and/or art insights. All three of these guys were confident, smart, and engaged. Why do they seem to feel so threatened? Here's a few quick thoughts: Point for PM: The Canadian art world was so clique-dependent, that for a critic to suggest one particular artist's work might participate in a discourse beyond the borders was to threaten the entire, small-stakes art economy at home. Point for GC and AP: The Canadian art world was very poor at recognising it's own excellence, and critics were required who demonstrate the value of great works in context of Canadian regional cultural influences. Point for PM: Post-modern, semiotic discourse created a shared social sphere for discussing visual art, adopting a language that was universally applicable and not dependent on insider knowledge of the artist's personal biography or intentions. Point for GC and AP: Post-modern, semiotic discourse stripped vital artworks of their specific, local socio-political function, and applied a layer of seemingly alien abstraction in its place. I wish I could post the essay and articles in their entirety. Here instead are quotes representing three of my favourite bits from each participant: Philip Monk: "If alienation from the natural world was something Ewen was trying to overcome and, as Robert Morris emphasizes, it is the turn to the natural world that is concomitant to working in material, then it is the material form of working that overcomes that alienation, rather than the fact of depicting, or representing nature itself..." From Phenomena: Paterson Ewen Paintings 1971-1987, exhibition catalogue, (Toronto: Art Gallery of Ontario, 1988), p. 26 Greg Curnoe: "Surrealism had an early influence in London [Ontario] dating from Selwyn and Irene Dewdney's friendship with Lionel Penrose wo worked in London from 1938 to 1945; he was the brother of Roland Penrose and a friend of Alix and James Strachey, translators of the Standard Edition of Freud's writings. Irene Dewdney has said recently that surrealism was a consuming interest for both her and her husband, and coincided with the first publication of Freud in English: this interest carried forward into their pioneering work with art therapy in the late forties at Westminster Hospital, the same veteran's hospital where Paterson Ewen stayed when he first arrived in London." From "Paterson Ewen: Phenomena Paintings 1971-1987, Monk's Dream," in Parachute (July-September 1989) p. 61 Andy Patton: "What Ewen did [in leaving Montréal for London] was to leave the city of Borduas and Molinari for the city of Curnoe and Chambers. It is always difficult to generalize about an art community as surprising and complex as London's but I want to point out certain emphases there that may have pushed the transformation of Ewen's work. The most obvious difference between the London and Montréal scenes at that time was that leading artists in London were by and large far more interested in the possibilities of representational work. And certainly the London community was much more strongly oriented toward recording the influence and events of daily life. From the international standpoint of the time, Montréal's concentration on abstract painting was much more advanced. What London offered Ewen were, from that standpoint, ways of working which were officially more retrograde since representation had been superseded in some way that was permanent. From our present perspective, artists in London were maintaining certain possibilities which were in disrepute and which would only later become relevant again. From "History Evaporates: Philip Monk and Paterson Ewen," in Parachute (July-September 1989) p. 65 Final (for now) Note: Canadian artist Ian Carr-Harris, much much more favourably disposed, also addressed Monk's take on Paterson Ewen in an in-depth (and interesting) article in Vanguard: "The obvious problem which emerges, and the one we face in this country, is a crisis arising from the failure of a local middle class to understand the importance of self-validation, or when it settles for validation from elsewhere, becomes colonial or branch-plant. Abdication of cultural self-interest always has the same consequences -- invalidation of the culture and voice of the class it represents. It is, in fact, a self-betrayal. In Canada, this betrayal has been fairly genial, and disguised by the difficulties of disentangling the cultural and political concerns that distinguish an evolving culture from its British and American colonial attachments. But geniality cannot disguise the confusion that results within our society, and the barely concealed contempt -- expressed as patronizing ignorance -- that others reveal towards that confusion. The consequence is further erosion of energetic action within our culture. This is tragic." From "Standing on the Mezzanine: Ewen, Wiitasalo, Monk, and the AGO" in Vanguard (December 1988 - January 1989) p. 10 | |
Artist Tom Moody, of Digital Media Tree art blog fame, has also been making some fun music. He did the excellent soundtrack for my Robot Landscapes installation in the spring. Tom has posted all his mp3s. Take a listen. I am partial to "Phil's Revenge" myself.
...[Philip] Monk proposed that, for the new art in Toronto at least, while representation can lead to action rather than to the mere contemplation allowed by formalist modernism, it is nevertheless only women artists who, in Monk's estimation, have shown a genuine and authoritative acquisition of representation and all that this slippery term means. [...] "The lines of difference," Monk wrote, "…are really between a passive resignation and melancholy despair, pessimism, nihilism and decadence on the one hand and the sense of the possibility of action on the other." Men, Monk insists, have given themselves over to a romantic yearning for aesthetic unity, to dreams of a fallen wholeness, to a longing for heroism; men he says, are basically expressionists. It is women who hold sway over meaningful representation." ...from "Reading Philip Monk: Analysing a complex and controversial theory about Canadian art and artists," by Gary Michael Dault in Canadian Art, Winter/December 1984, Volume 1, Number 2, p.70-73. To read the whole article, go to the Canadian Art websiteWow...cool, eh? So controversial. I wonder, is this when Philip Monk allegedly jumped the shark? I applaud Canadian Art for putting up these old articles, very helpful to anyone like me obsessed with recent Canadian art history. I spent the 2nd half of the 80s in art school in Nova Scotia. I remember Philip Monk came to give a lecture and showed slides of paintings by Joanne Tod. I liked them. I was painting at the time, and being told by staff and fellow students in no uncertain terms that I (in my self-referrential irony) was making "boy" art, and that I had to "realise that women make a different kind of work." I can still feel the flush of weird inarticulated frustration that came over me in the face of these statements. And it was kind of true, at least in the context of the painting department at my school. The only people who related to my projects were guys: faculty like Gary Neil Kenedy, who was supportive and bemused, and fellow students who were themselves tied up in knots about the impossiblity of meaning, the death of painting, and such spirals of despair. Monk's statement (as filtered through Dault) sounds preposterous, but I feel like I know something of what he meant. While venturing into ironic or self-referential territory got me slaps on the wrist from other females (the laden scrawl, "Clever girl" written in the comment book of my graduating show still stings), I was still less boxed in, and had more generative scope to play with signs and signifiers than my male fellows.
I just realised this blog is over one year old! I've changed the header image in celebration. Here's a link to my first ever post (Nov. 18, 2003).