Speaking of iconoclasm, here's a very sad example.

Standing Buddha, Bamiyan, Afghanistan, c. 5th century CE

Standing Buddha destroyed in 2001

...Bruno Latour said,

Have [religious icons] not been emptied by aesthetic judgment, absorbed by art history, made routine by conventional piety, to the point of being dead forever? On the contrary, it is enough to remember the reactions to the destructions of the Bamiyan Buddhas by the Taliban in Afghanistan, to realize that religious images are still the ones that attract the fiercest passions.

And here is an interesting book review from The Guardian that provides some nuanced background to the story.

In 1842 a British prisoner of Afghan soldiers recalled his captors firing idly at the statues and "cursing them as idols"; on the other hand, a 12th-century Islamic text titled The Wonders of Creation marvelled at these "talismanic" images and declared that "the Creator gives divine inspiration to His subjects to make such wonders". Tellingly, a member of a delegation of 11 Muslim clerics who pleaded with Mullah Omar to cancel the demolition, would later say that the Taliban "had no knowledge about Islam. They are so naive, they really can be influenced."

For some reason, my mind keeps pairing the lost Bamiyan Buddhas, with this statue of Marcus Aurelius (and his small-ish horse), which is not lots. The statue has survived by fluke. During the Medieval period, Christians destroyed a lot of classical Roman sculptures, and the bronze ones in particular were melted down for metal. This one survived because, as the story goes, the figure was at that time taken for Constantine, the emperor who had effectively legalized Christianity in 313 CE.

Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius, c.176 CE

After seeing the current ROM exhibition Mesopotamia: Inventing Our World, showcasing famous artifacts from the British Museum (clay tablets with cuneiform - including Epic of Gilgamesh! - more on this later), I have been thinking more about the looting of the National Museum of Iraq during the American occupation.

Iraq National Museum in Baghdad, after looting and destruction, 2003

Iraq National Museum in Baghdad, after restoration, 2009

Many of the obejcts from the early 19th century English and US excavations in Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq) were divided up between the British Museum, The Penn Museum in Philadelphia, and the government of Iraq (also Berlin and Chicago). One video in the ROM exhibition talked a little about the history of the archaeology from a Western perspective. This was projected next to a vitrine with an English, Victorian necklace made from Sumerian cylinder seals and a Victorian painting of an English woman wearing similar jewelery. That was a bit chilling. I'm glad they included it. (UPDATE: VB corrects me. It was a portrait of a woman wearing the exact necklace and she was married one of the archaeologists, who made it for her.)

The exhibition at the ROM is billed as "extraordinary treasures of Sumer, Assyria and Babylon from the British Museum," but it does have objects from other museums as well including, of course, things from the ROM's collection, such as a Striding Lion from the palace of King Nebuchadnezzar. The show also has the magnificent Head of a Man from Nineveh, which belongs to the Iraq National Museum.

Head of a Man, c.2300-2200 BCE

This is probably supposed to be Sargon of Akkad, a powerful ruler. The damage to the head was inflicted intentionally thousands of years ago, probably by somebody making a political statement.