LOL salmon scan nabbed from prefrontal.org What does it mean when an fMRI scanner reveals activity in the brain of a dead fish? A: dead fish can still think about thingsCraig Bennett, the guy who put the dead salmon in the scanner, would say B, would definitely not say A, and probably would not say C. (update:Craig Bennett has clarified his stance in the comment section : he would say no to 'A', yes to 'B', and always to 'C'. - thanks Craig!) * The goal of the Salmon poster was to encourage the minority of researchers who report uncorrected statistics to move forward and begin using basic multiple comparisons correction in their research. The Salmon doesn’t add anything to the technical discussion of how multiple comparisons correction is performed, it is simply a salient reminder of why proper correction is always necessary.I respectfully take his points. But I was already leaning towards C before this salmon data and I'm still kind of going with it. note: almost every story I've seen about this says that some people took the data to prove the existence of the ethereal soul. After a fair amount of searching, I still haven't found any such person. another note: the best part of this story is that — in order to keep their variables consistent by running exactly the same kind of experiment as they always do — the researchers showed the dead salmon pictures of human people doing things and asked it what emotions it thought the people were feeling. (thanks to Rob for the tip) |
return to: sally mckay and lorna mills |
"...allymckay/comment/52631/?/ Content-Length: 0 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 ..." |