Nice. What's the scale?
6 ft by 4 2/3 ft. I oriented it landscape so no scrolling would be required (it's also flipped). It's still in progress: I'm converting a pinned up wall drawing (left hand side of photo) into a continous mosaic piece (right) by taping scrap paper in the interstitial spaces. The steps required to do this are ridiculous, and it's taking forever. I posted something so I'd feel like I had a result already.
It's always good when, despite the time put in 'into the making', at least you get some of that back in the looking. And I guess it's good to know that once the making's over you can come back free of charge and take a look again and forget time altogether--that's called "looking good".
In it's current state, there's tension between the filled monochrome and the unfilled polychrome, with the filled polychrome in the balance. Molecular collision? Atom to atom combat?
|
- tom moody 8-20-2004 7:14 am
Nice. What's the scale?
- mark 8-20-2004 8:11 am
6 ft by 4 2/3 ft. I oriented it landscape so no scrolling would be required (it's also flipped). It's still in progress: I'm converting a pinned up wall drawing (left hand side of photo) into a continous mosaic piece (right) by taping scrap paper in the interstitial spaces. The steps required to do this are ridiculous, and it's taking forever. I posted something so I'd feel like I had a result already.
- tom moody 8-20-2004 8:27 am
It's always good when, despite the time put in 'into the making', at least you get some of that back in the looking. And I guess it's good to know that once the making's over you can come back free of charge and take a look again and forget time altogether--that's called "looking good".
- brent (guest) 8-21-2004 6:53 am
In it's current state, there's tension between the filled monochrome and the unfilled polychrome, with the filled polychrome in the balance. Molecular collision? Atom to atom combat?
- mark 8-21-2004 7:13 am