tom moody

tom moody's weblog
(2001 - 2007)

tommoody.us (2004 - )

2001-2007 archive

main site

faq

digital media tree (or "home" below)


RSS / validator



BLOG in gallery / AFC / artCal / furtherfield on BLOG

room sized animated GIFs / pics

geeks in the gallery / 2 / 3

fuzzy logic

and/or gallery / pics / 2

rhizome interview / illustrated

ny arts interview / illustrated

visit my cubicle

blogging & the arts panel

my dorkbot talk / notes

infinite fill show


music

video




Links:

coalition casualties

civilian casualties

iraq today / older

mccain defends bush's iraq strategy

eyebeam reBlog

hullabaloo

tyndall report

aron namenwirth

bloggy / artCal

james wagner

what really happened

stinkoman

antiwar.com

cory arcangel / at del.icio.us

juan cole

a a attanasio

rhizome.org

three rivers online

unknown news

eschaton

prereview

edward b. rackley

travelers diagram at del.icio.us

atomic cinema

lovid

cpb::softinfo :: blog

vertexList

paper rad / info

nastynets now

the memory hole

de palma a la mod

aaron in japan

NEWSgrist

chris ashley

comiclopedia

discogs

counterpunch

9/11 timeline

tedg on film

art is for the people

x-eleven

jim woodring

stephen hendee

steve gilliard

mellon writes again

eyekhan

adrien75 / 757

disco-nnect

WFMU's Beware of the Blog

travis hallenbeck

paul slocum

guthrie lonergan / at del.icio.us

tom moody


View current page
...more recent posts



There is an excellent piece in The Nation this week by Win McCormack titled "Deconstructing the Election."
His argument, in a nutshell, is: (1) French philosophers Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida say there are no fixed meanings, only spin, and those with the power control the spin. (2) Conservative writers such as Lynne Cheney and Dinesh D'Souza say these ideas are a threat to the Republic and our way of life. (3) By asserting, during the recent election standoff, that machine counts were superior to hand counts and that judges could not be trusted not to vote their party affiliation, James Baker essentially argued that there is no meaning, only spin. (4) Therefore, by the Republicans' own logic, Baker (and his boss) are a threat to the Republic and our way of life. Working within this framework, McCormack gives a good recap of the GOP's ruthless power-grab during the standoff.

- Tom Moody 3-13-2001 6:47 pm [link] [9 comments]



I have recently launched a website documenting my artwork and writing. What I hope to do is put the work in context, through installation shots, critical texts, and discussions of the work of artists I've been showing with. Soon there will be more images and reviews. I welcome all comments and feedback.

- Tom Moody 3-10-2001 6:55 pm [link] [4 comments]



In last week's Slate, David Edelstein reviews the movie Pollock, poking fun at what he considers its pretentious artspeak. He makes an annoying, perhaps willfully obtuse error about critic Clement Greenberg, referring to him as an "Artforum poo-bah" when in fact, back in Pollock's heyday of the '40s and 50s, Greenberg wrote for Partisan Review and The Nation (Artforum didn't appear until the '60s). I posted on The Fray to comment on this, and got an "editor's pick." I'm pleased about that, but they really should revise the review.

- Tom Moody 2-21-2001 8:33 pm [link] [5 comments]



Joanna Pataki and I recently launched a web site devoted to the writer Doris Piserchia. She (Doris) labored in the salt mines of science fiction from 1966-1983 (although her work was actually too quirky and fascinating to be so easily pigeonholed) and then dropped out of sight after a family tragedy. She denies it, but several of her books were aimed squarely at precocious teenagers (girls in particular), and she acquired some lifetime fans as they grew up to become teachers, software writers, and--judging by some of the writing I've found--feminist book critics. Other of her novels might be described as sociological or biological horror, addressing issues of urbanization, dehumanization, and science-run-amok in a droll, "black comedy" style. As an artist, I was drawn to her writing because of her incredible visual imagination: if Bosch were a writer rather than a painter, this is what he might produce.

Toward the end of her string of 13 novels, she published two books under a man's name (Curt Selby). One website we link to (Strange Words) makes a big deal of this fact, like she had to conform to the male standards of the Science Fiction Publishing Conspiracy or else get kneecapped, or something. In the interview we conducted with her, Piserchia refuses to play the victim--she says "Don Wollheim [of DAW Books] published four of my books that year. He wanted another name." According to Piserchia, she was on a roll in '82, scouting for new markets; she chose the name "Curt Selby" (an ancestor), and the books she wrote under it are just as eccentric and uncompromising as the rest of her production. With 20/20 hindsight, it might look like she was caving in to an adolescent-male-driven market, but if she had continued writing under her own name (as she apparently had every intention of doing) and eventually pushed through to broader recognition (with a movie deal or whatever), who's to say how history might have viewed the Selby decision?

In any event, the site is a work-in-progress; we'll be adding to it, to give a better, fuller picture of the writer than what's there now. We welcome all feedback. With the advent of online bookselling, used copies of Piserchia's books aren't that hard to come by: I recommend Doomtime, The Spinner, Earth in Twilight, and Selby's I, Zombie for starters.

Once again, here's the link to the website.

- Tom Moody 2-21-2001 8:06 pm [link] [6 comments]