The official Meet The Press page doesn't have this weeks transcript up yet. Here is an excerpt from a Drudge page that probably won't stay at this address forever (so I'm copying the text.) NBC's MEET THE PRESS joined in progress....
TIM RUSSERT: Finally, Mr. Secretary, in February of 2003, you placed your enormous personal credibility before the United Nations and laid out a case against Saddam Hussein, citing.
(Camera moved off of interview subject)
EMILY MILLER, STATE DEPARTMENT PRESS AIDE: You're off.
SECRETARY POWELL: I am not off.
EMILY MILLER, PRESS AIDE: No. They can't use it, they're editing it.
SECRETARY POWELL: He's still asking the questions.
EMILY MILLER, PRESS AIDE: He was not ...
SECRETARY POWELL: Tim, I am sorry I lost you.
MR. RUSSERT: I am right here Mr. Secretary. I would hope they would put you back on camera. I don't know who did that.
EMILY MILLER, PRESS AIDE: He was going to go for another five minutes.
SECRETARY POWELL: We've really scre...
MR. RUSSERT: I think that was one of your staff Mr. Secretary. I don't think that's appropriate.
SECRETARY POWELL: Emily, get out of the way. Bring the camera back please. (Camera returns to the interview subject) I think we're back on Tim, go ahead with your last question.
MR. RUSSERT: Thank you very much, sir.
In February of 2003, you put your enormous personal reputation on the line before the United Nations and said that you had solid sources for the case against Saddam Hussein. It now appears that an agent called "Curve Ball" had misled the CIA by suggesting that Saddam had trucks and trains that were delivering biological chemical weapons.
How concerned are you that some of the information you shared with the world is now inaccurate and discredited?
SECRETARY POWELL: I'm very concerned. When I made that presentation in February 2003, it was based on the best information that the Central Intelligence Agency made available to me. We studied it carefully. We looked at the sourcing and the case of the mobile trucks and trains. There was multiple sourcing for that. Unfortunately, that multiple sourcing over time has turned out to be not accurate, and so I'm deeply disappointed.
But I'm also comfortable that at the time that I made the presentation it reflected the collective judgment, the sound judgment, of the intelligence community, but it turned out that the sourcing was inaccurate and wrong and, in some cases, deliberately misleading. And for that I'm disappointed, and I regret it.
MR. RUSSERT: Mr. Secretary, we thank you very much for joining us again and sharing your views with us today. SECRETARY POWELL: Thanks, Tim.
(END OF PRE-TAPE INTERVIEW)
MR. RUSSERT: AND THAT WAS AN UNEDITED INTERVIEW WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, TAPED EARLIER THIS MORNING FROM JORDAN.
WE APPRECIATE SECRETARY POWELL'S WILLINGNESS TO OVERRULE HIS PRESS AIDES' ATTEMPT TO ABRUPTLY CUT OFF OUR DISCUSSION AS I BEGAN TO ASK MY FINAL QUESTION.
Later in the program McCain was on, and when Russert asked him a question about the VP issue that he didn't want to talk about he started by joking (close paraphrase): well, I wish the camera would pan over to a palm tree right now...
"collective judgement", "BushBorg Collective Mind"? Whatever.
video clip
I wish the tape started about 30 seconds earlier. The camera swivels right after Russert says "in Feb 2003..." Was "Emily" that sure it was the "money question"? Powell's mushy (literally hand-wringing) answer about wishing we'd had better intelligence is just pathetic after so many people have died.
Powell whining about being duped by Chalabi is about as compelling as Feinstein whining about being duped by Bush.
later, russert was a guest on CNNīs late edition, and he and wolf blitzer replayed the tape and talked for a while about how terrible it was. they didnīt mention emily millerīs name, but it didnīt seem like they really ever wanted to hear it again, either. russert said powell called him from his plane later that day to apologize.
|
- jim 5-16-2004 9:06 pm
The official Meet The Press page doesn't have this weeks transcript up yet. Here is an excerpt from a Drudge page that probably won't stay at this address forever (so I'm copying the text.)
- jim 5-16-2004 9:11 pm [add a comment]
Later in the program McCain was on, and when Russert asked him a question about the VP issue that he didn't want to talk about he started by joking (close paraphrase): well, I wish the camera would pan over to a palm tree right now...
- jim 5-16-2004 9:13 pm [add a comment]
"collective judgement", "BushBorg Collective Mind"? Whatever.
- mark 5-16-2004 10:06 pm [add a comment]
video clip
- mark 5-17-2004 12:44 am [add a comment]
I wish the tape started about 30 seconds earlier. The camera swivels right after Russert says "in Feb 2003..." Was "Emily" that sure it was the "money question"? Powell's mushy (literally hand-wringing) answer about wishing we'd had better intelligence is just pathetic after so many people have died.
- tom moody 5-17-2004 10:58 am [add a comment]
Powell whining about being duped by Chalabi is about as compelling as Feinstein whining about being duped by Bush.
- mark 5-17-2004 12:31 pm [add a comment]
later, russert was a guest on CNNīs late edition, and he and wolf blitzer replayed the tape and talked for a while about how terrible it was. they didnīt mention emily millerīs name, but it didnīt seem like they really ever wanted to hear it again, either. russert said powell called him from his plane later that day to apologize.
- big jimmy in london (guest) 5-17-2004 2:05 pm [add a comment]