In AW's inditement of "jerks" he implicates himself if you extend the "takes one" axiom. Since I don't agree with his critique, he's automaticly off the hook and there remains but one original "jerk" to the story. It's fuzzy logic, but it's my logic.

I think Bush contridicted himself, proving he *did care* by doubling back and repeatedly asking "who are you with ?".


- bill 7-19-2001 11:07 pm
back to treehouse     top of this thread

fuzzy logic, fuzzier spelling.
- dave 7-19-2001 11:14 pm [5 comments]





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.


[home] [subscribe] [login]