Part two is up. It's long. Interesting as background, but probably not a necessary read unless you're really into this stuff. The short version is that he can't really say anything directly about the interesting part (possible criminal activity by "senior white house officials") because if it is true then it would presently be under investigation and he wouldn't be able to comment on it. There are lots of hypotheticals in this interview. I guess it's wait and see.
- jim 9-23-2003 6:16 pm





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.