That means you're paying an extra $350 for the lens and taking a .2 hit in megapixels. I would bet that the better glass (As if Nikon or Canon are slouches in the lens dept) won't make up for the loss in res when it comes to sharpness.
I might consider spending the savings on a M2 or M3 body, You could pick up a decent m mount 50mm lens for about the same price then you'd have resolution up the wazoo for the larger print jobs.
Damn, it is pretty though, almost too pretty to use.
|
I might consider spending the savings on a M2 or M3 body, You could pick up a decent m mount 50mm lens for about the same price then you'd have resolution up the wazoo for the larger print jobs.
- steve 11-30-2004 8:18 pm
Damn, it is pretty though, almost too pretty to use.
- steve 11-30-2004 8:21 pm [add a comment]