O.K., I think I have located the problem. Seems like if you go back and edit a post, any comments that have already been posted underneath it are left orphaned. Should be fixed soon (Can you guys confirm this: Dave, did you edit the riothero RAW post (I lost one under there) and jiml, did you edit the d-day post (where dave lost one underneath)?)
I might have fixed it. Although the problem didn't always seem to be happening, so there might still be a bug in there. Have to go eat now, so I guess we'll have to wait and see. Please let me know if any of your posts get lost.
yes i did edit it
I don't think I edited the Dday post, or if I did/do its almost always immediatedly after posting, quickly enough so it is unlikely that anyone would post in the time between my post and(edited) repost. However, I can say that up until a few minutes ago I think I was operating from a different version than everyone else, or at least different from dave. I was getting ready to comment on this only one of the problems with my version was that the ability to comment was decreasing by the day. Meaning there would be no "comment" after a post. For some reason I went through dratfinks page and entered the tree from there and realized that his version was more the better than mine so I just copy and pasted his version (can I catch anything from doing that?) to my Netscape toolbar and now all the pages seem to work fine.
Wow. I would love to understand what was happening there. Can you remember any specific differences in the URL's (the old one you were using vs. the new one from Dave?) There are a lot of copies of older system versions lying around in different directories. http://www.digitalmediatree.com will always take you to the most recent version. (Plus, I try to redirect every other possible address to the latest version, but it is possible I miss some pages.)
|
- jim 6-06-2000 9:02 pm
I might have fixed it. Although the problem didn't always seem to be happening, so there might still be a bug in there. Have to go eat now, so I guess we'll have to wait and see. Please let me know if any of your posts get lost.
- jim 6-06-2000 9:14 pm [add a comment]
yes i did edit it
- dave 6-06-2000 9:28 pm [add a comment]
I don't think I edited the Dday post, or if I did/do its almost always immediatedly after posting, quickly enough so it is unlikely that anyone would post in the time between my post and(edited) repost. However, I can say that up until a few minutes ago I think I was operating from a different version than everyone else, or at least different from dave. I was getting ready to comment on this only one of the problems with my version was that the ability to comment was decreasing by the day. Meaning there would be no "comment" after a post. For some reason I went through dratfinks page and entered the tree from there and realized that his version was more the better than mine so I just copy and pasted his version (can I catch anything from doing that?) to my Netscape toolbar and now all the pages seem to work fine.
- jimlouis 6-07-2000 1:58 am [add a comment]
Wow. I would love to understand what was happening there. Can you remember any specific differences in the URL's (the old one you were using vs. the new one from Dave?) There are a lot of copies of older system versions lying around in different directories. http://www.digitalmediatree.com will always take you to the most recent version. (Plus, I try to redirect every other possible address to the latest version, but it is possible I miss some pages.)
- jim 6-07-2000 2:53 am [add a comment]
http://www.digitalmediatree.com/dmt2/draw.php3?global=0:1: is the one that was becoming weird and http://www.digitalmediatree.com/draw.php3?global=0:1: is the one I got from Dave, I think.
- jimlouis 6-07-2000 3:12 am [add a comment]
Yes. The ...dmt2/draw.php3 should have been redirecting you to the newer one. Maybe your browser doesn't redirect. Are you using a version 3.0 of something? Anyway, the new one should be much better.
- jim 6-07-2000 3:17 am [add a comment]
No, Version 4.72, but it's fine now.
- jimlouis 6-07-2000 3:19 am [add a comment]