i was not unaware of the humor (can we ever forget steves rant about the banality of the use of alternate filmstocks for the mexican scenes?) but i thought i would use the occasion as an excuse to vent upon the shabbiness of my purchase. as for the article itself, alex was probably right, it was more about buckley and drugs than the movie, but with such a spiffy new file, i would try to find reasons to use it. in reality, i should have read the piece before commenting anyway. although having done so, i would stand by my original organizing principles. did i mention i do a mean william f buckley impersonation?
Actually it was my rant about alternating film stocks. Steve made the excellent point that what worked in the Wizard of Oz wasn't necessarily right for this Hard-Hitting Movie That Changes The Way We Think About Drugs.
|
- dave 3-18-2001 5:50 am
Actually it was my rant about alternating film stocks. Steve made the excellent point that what worked in the Wizard of Oz wasn't necessarily right for this Hard-Hitting Movie That Changes The Way We Think About Drugs.
- Tom Moody 3-18-2001 6:33 am [1 comment]