Interesting Neal Stephenson article about the history of rockets and the strange lock-in we can encounter along paths of technical innovation. To employ a commonly used metaphor, our current proficiency in rocket-building is the result of a hill-climbing approach; we started at one place on the technological landscape—which must be considered a random pick, given that it was chosen for dubious reasons by a maniac—and climbed the hill from there, looking for small steps that could be taken to increase the size and efficiency of the device. Sixty years and a couple of trillion dollars later, we have reached a place that is infinitesimally close to the top of that hill. Rockets are as close to perfect as they're ever going to get. For a few more billion dollars we might be able to achieve a microscopic improvement in efficiency or reliability, but to make any game-changing improvements is not merely expensive; it's a physical impossibility. |
return to: /treehouse |
"...ageback/53578/?/ Content-Length: 0 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 ..." |
"...ageback/53568/?/ Content-Length: 0 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 ..." |