...more recent posts
Looks like the RIAA is seriously going after Napster now. They are going to try to force Napster to remove all major label content from their servers. And they are trying to get an injunction to force Napster to comply while the legal battle is being fought. The obvious pro-Napster argument is "O.K., sure, done!" because the content isn't on their servers (only pointers to where the content is,) but my guess is that the RIAA might win this one regardless of such technical details. The funny thing is, defeating Napster will be the worse thing for the music industry. I'm not saying they shouldn't try. It might be that they have to pursue this or be seen as weak and ineffectual, but seriously, this will spell the end for them. As long as Napster is around I doubt that freenet or gnutella could break out to mass acceptance. They are simply not as easy to use. But if all the content comes down off Napster, people will switch. And at least with Napster the RIAA has someone to strike a comprise deal with. Stopping Gnutella would involve something like shutting down the internet - probably not going to happen. So while all this pirating may well be wrong, ethically speaking, I'm not sure that arguing ethical philosophy is really what the RIAA should be doing. To me it seems like they cut a deal with MP3.com, but are drawing the line with Napster. But what they should do is cut a deal with Napster and draw the line with Freenet and Gnutella.
Here's some speculation about the future of information architecture. 100% new buzzword compliant. Yet more proof that everyone is thinking the same thing these days. (I know this is just an illusion of (my) perspective, but that doesn't make watching this convergence any less interesting.)