...more recent posts
Bruce Sterling on SXSW and everything else. I'd pull a quote, but you should really read the whole thing. Nobody is safe with him at the keyboard.
I have the new system up and running (on a different site first, for testing.) Everything went pretty smoothly. I grabbed the old site contents with an HTML scraper I built, and loaded it into the new database running locally on my imac. Then I used mysqldump to get a textfile of the local database, sent it back up to the remote server, deleted the old database (gulp,) and loaded in the new one from the mysqldump file. Took down all the old scripts and put up all the new ones. Took about one hour, plus two more to fix a bunch of stuff I hadn't thought of in my planning. Not too bad.
So I'm on schedule. I'm hoping the users on that site will find any obvious bugs this week while I try yet again to write some help files. It will be a triumph if I can finally make myself do this task.
If all goes well I'll have this site changed over by the end of the month. Theoretically I could have it done in two weeks, but let's just say one month. No sense getting carried away.
Go read rageboy right now. At least that entry and the next three. That is some good stuff.
This world, this life so intricate, delicate, complex. Precious beyond measure. I’m slamming my head against the walls of empire, the habits of power, enraged. Blasting and burning for your love. Imagining the network finally connected. Imagining joy. A wall of horns and drums and dangerous magical noise. I’m bending over my Fender, working the circuits, incendiary, incandescent. Rocking in the free world, serving notice on Babylon. Ain’t in for a dollar, ain’t in for a dime. Ain’t going down for no two-bit dream. Armed only with imagination, I’m back in your spiral arms tonight. Everything has at least two meanings. But one thing girl that I want to say, love is love and not fade away.
I've got a new feature coming soon. It's pretty simple, but I think it might be powerful in terms of really helping conversations flow. Particularly for these highly interlinked conversations that have been going on, around, and through doc, rageboy, David Weinberger, Tom Matrullo, AKMA, etc.... These guys are saying some interesting stuff about blogs, and what this all means, but sometimes it's hard to find the periphery of the conversation. More soon.
There's no doubt that I don't know enough to judge this one, but if it's true...
Holy shit. The math works. Bernstein has found ways of using additional hardware to eliminate redundancies and inefficiencies which appear in any linear implementation of the Number Field Sieve. We just never noticed that they were inefficiencies and redundancies because we kept thinking in terms of linear implementations. This is probably the biggest news in crypto in the last decade. I'm astonished that it hasn't been louder.Here's the top ranked replies in the slashdot thread. (I don't pay too close attention, but I'm pretty sure this is an unusually high ratio of +5 posts - 21 out of 423.)
Note that there have been rumors of an RSA cracker built by a three-letter agency in custom silicon before this, but until analyzing Bernstein's paper I had always dismissed them as ridiculous paranoid fantasies. Now it looks like such a device is entirely feasible and, in fact, likely.
Well they didn't come out too good, but I put some pictures up anyway from dinner last night at Alias (76 Clinton.)
I mentioned Bill Seitz's excellent Wiki the other day. Today Stating the Obvious has a short exchange with the man himself. Nice links.
The new chef from 71 was in for dinner last night. We were talking a bit at the bar, and he was asking me about the iPod. Turns out he has one and was curious about how to exchange music among multiple computers. I told him he needed something like this to do it (except there was no hyperlink in my conversation - not quite as helpful.) Anyway, I went on to ask him about having a Mac because I'm always curious about people who don't choose Windows. Turns out his girlfriend used to work for Apple, and for Next! I don't think you can impress me more than by saying you worked for Next. Not that I know much, but they seemed really cool. Hopefully I'll get a chance to talk with her soon.
AIML: Artificial Intelligence Markup Language.
(Not that it matters, but can intelligence ever be artificial? What does that even mean? I think this distinction will become increasingly unclear.)
If I were writing a hollywood terrorist thriller it would go like this:
Main character would be a Johnnie Walker type all american kid descending into the murky underworld of militant islamic thinking. He rises quickly in the terrorist network like Johnny Depp rising through the drug smuggling ranks in Blow. Eventually, after a series of exciting capers proving his abilities, he is given the big job of making a deal with the Russian mob for a nuclear device. He gets to the deal expecting to take posession of the bomb, but the clever Kyser Sose-ish bad guy calmly informs him that he does not have the device. Pause. "Because it's already in the U.S."
It turns out that the Soviets, years ago, fearing the U.S. ability to cripple all their long range nuclear capabilities with some sort of lightning first strike (EM bomb?) planted nuclear weapons at many key points inside this country. Deep cover secret agents exist just waiting for the orders to trigger the devices. After the break up of the Soviet Union there was no real way, or desire, to deactivate these devices. So instead of an actual bomb, Johnny gets the location of several devices and the satellite codes needed to defeat the fail safe mechanisms. Nail biting chase ensues, followed by an improbable computer hacking scene (the single master password is the name of some Soviet general's mistress, or possibly his cat.) But in the final scene it turns out Johnny was working for the CIA all the time. When you think he is about to blow up Washington D.C., he is really deactivating the bomb. He suceeds with one second to spare, of course. Much rejoicing.
Note: I didn't say it would be a good movie.
The New York Times has yet another article on weblogs today. Page C6. Same old story. "Weblogs could be big, and maybe even important, but right now they all suck." They give the last work to some guy who used to blog, but stopped in favor of email. He says, "If you want to communicate with people, email it to them. Don't force them to come to your site every day..." That is ridiculous. There is much more force involved in an email list. It shows up in your in box whether you feel like reading it that day or not. Plus, it destroys the most important thing: archives. What good are all those emails? Who can ever get at that information? Emails just sit on people's hard drives until their systems crash or get thrown out.