...more recent posts
Just another quick reminder: your email client should not process or create or have any sort of truck with HTML. Clear? The idea that a program might go beyond this, and also process javascript and VBscript is either negligent or criminally insane. As for people who use such products, well, I'll just go with them being "uneducated". Now the question is, do you want to broadcast your uneducated-ness every time you send an email? No you don't. Use plaintext. Now go back to your business, forget I or anyone else ever said these things, and... hey! check out all these pictures of Anna Kournikova....
Here's some detailed explanations of Google's new usenet archives. You absolutely must read this page and familiarize yourself with the new system. This is perhaps the single most important resource on the web. There will be a test on Monday. (If you're wondering what the heck usenet is then you might want to take a look at this page first.)
Andrew Odlyzko: Papers on Electronic Publishing and Electronic Commerce. Good stuff. And lots of it. The link is from a very complete rant called "what's wrong with content protection" by John Gilmore. [update: Here's a more permanent link to the Gilmore paper. Worth a read.]
Salon picks the 10 most paranoid books of all time. What? No Illuminatus? This must be some sort of plot...
The largest natural crystals on earth.
O.K., how come I didn't know about this? Google bought Deja? Now you can search .5 terrabytes of usenet postings (back to 1995) and see them all right off the (fast) google servers. Between this, and google.com/linux I think even I will be able to (con)figure the new server. (Did you know there is a google.com/mac and a google.com/unclesam too? Pretty useful.)
[update: Oh, O.K., I didn't know because it was just announced.]
The 9th Circuit court handed down its opinion today on the RIAA vs. Napster case. Sounds like a loss for Napster, although they get to keep operating for the time being. Probably it's hard to say how this will actually play out. The court said that the previous ruling (which would have just shut Napster down completely,) was "overbroad", but they also said that Napster "knowingly encourages and assists its users to infringe the record companies' copyrights." (Ouch.) And that some sort of modified (not just outright shutdown?) injunction is "not only warranted but required." I think we might be back to square one where this ruling will create a new injunction that basically allows Napster to keep running as long as they don't allow any copyrighted material that they are aware of to be traded. The problem, again, is that there is no way for Napster (presently configured) to be aware of all the material flowing through the system. In any case, they're not shutting down today, and the RIAA can claim a theoretical victory. A little something for everyone.
Disgruntled physics student lab report: Electron Band Structure In Germanium, My Ass. (via robotwisdom)
Here's a screen shot of Apple's new DVD studio pro. You can get a pretty good sense of the program from it, actually. Or maybe that's just because I'm familiar with Final Cut.
"How exactly are chips produced on those giant cookie sheets anyway?" This is a don't miss for the hopelessly geeky.