War (of Words) with Syria
View current page...more recent posts
Thursday, May 01, 2003
[Do the Israelis have to make their demands on the US so obvious? The word for today is "subtlety". Look it up, Ayalon.]
Israeli envoy urges regime change in Syria and Iran
The Guardian -- April 29
Oliver Burkeman in Washington
Israel's ambassador to the US called for "regime change" in Iran and Syria yesterday as players in the Middle East staked out their positions before a crucial Palestinian vote that is expected to trigger publication of the American-backed "road map" to peace.
Removing Saddam Hussein was "not enough", said Daniel Ayalon. But war against Syria and Iran was not the answer, he added, advocating isolating them diplomatically, imposing economic sanctions and using "psychological pressure".
The war in Iraq "has to follow through", he told a conference in Washington of the Anti-Defamation League, an organisation that campaigns against anti-semitism. "We still have great threats of that magnitude coming from Syria, coming from Iran."
[Graham on Syria, Lebanon, Hezbollah.]
Senator criticizes tax and Iraq policies
The Miami Herald (via SJ Merc) -- April 28
BY TYLER BRIDGES
Sen. Bob Graham criticized President George W. Bush for his tax and Iraq policies Sunday, in his first appearance on national television as a presidential candidate.
Graham also criticized Bush saying the United States ought to confront the Syrian government over terrorist groups -- such as Hezbollah -- based in Syria and Syria-controlled northern Lebanon. Graham said those terrorist groups present the greatest threat to Americans.
The Bush administration has been reluctant to challenge Syria overtly, preferring to wage war on Iraq.
''We have virtually abandoned the war on terrorism,'' Graham said. ``We have withdrawn military and intelligence capabilities from Afghanistan, and because of that, al Qaeda has been able to regroup, that we have not taken on the A-team of Hezbollah and the others in Syria and Lebanon, that we have allowed our alliances, which are going to be absolutely critical to winning the war on terrorism, to disintegrate.''
[Anti-Hezbollah editorial.]
Ada'af al Imaan (Hezbollah's Arms)
Dar al hayat (Lebanon) -- April 30
Dawood Al Shirian
The Lebanese people yearn for Hezbollah's disarmament even more than the Americans do. The party's armament remains the main political problem in Lebanon, since the Taif Accords. But the occupation of the South prompted all parties and confessions in the country to overlook this problem. But this does not mean that the party's armament is an intentional Lebanese national policy. The issue is made to appear natural, namely that the resistance's units are not emergency military groups or that they are in barracks, but rather citizens living in their villages. But based on this logic, other confessions and groups would have to be armed, and to protect themselves and their villages, and this would take Lebanon straight back to the era of militias.
[Hezbollah stands its ground.]
Hezbollah: U.S. Demands To Disarm Us "Will Not Be Met With A Positive Response"
Dar al hayat (Lebanon) -- April 29
Walid Choucair
Hussein Al Khalil, Assistant Secretary General of Hezbollah, said that the request the United States made to Lebanon and Syria that the party be disarmed "will not meet a favorable response."
In an interview with Al Hayat, he said: "I will not speak on behalf of Syria and the Lebanese government. But according to our reading of the Lebanese situation, I believe that this demand will not meet a favorable response."
"With regard to Hezbollah," he added, "the U.S. and Israel carried out an aggression against Lebanon in July 1993 under that same pretext. But that aggression failed. And in April 1996, the enemy made another attempt at a larger scale, and mobilized all its supporters around the world, rallying them at the Sharm Al Sheikh summit. But in the end, Hezbollah and Lebanon came out stronger than before. Today, if the enemy repeats the same foolish action, then the party will adopt the same position, and God willing, we will have similar results."
Al Hayat asked Al Khalil about the American demand that Hezbollah withdraw from the frontiers with Israel and that the Lebanese army deploy in the area. Al Khalil answered: "there is nothing in our dictionary called the withdrawal of Hezbollah from the South. Our sons and those of the resistance are the sons of all villages located throughout the South. We are not a foreign military group in barracks. We cannot ask people to leave their villages."
About the deployment of the Lebanese army in the South, he said: "there are two theories in this respect; the first is the demand that the army should be in charge of security in the South, which is already the case since the army is present throughout the area. The second theory calls upon the army to defend Israel. We don't believe the army will defend the Israeli occupation."
[New Lebanese pro-Syria cabinet wins vote of confidence.]
Lebanon cabinet wins parliament confidence
UPI -- April 30
By Dalal Saoud
BEIRUT, Lebanon -- A majority of Lebanon's 128-member Parliament granted the new Cabinet of Prime Minister Rafic Hariri a vote of confidence Wednesday.
Some 85 parliamentarians voted in favor, 14 abstained and 12 voted against the 30-member half-Christian, half-Muslim body. Seventeen deputies did not attend Wednesday's session, which wrapped up two days of deliberations during which deputies criticized the hasty formation of the new Cabinet.
Hariri emphasized the need to join hands to confront "the political and pan-Arab challenges facing the Arab region and Syria."
He told parliamentarians the "delicate internal political conditions and the sensitive circumstances facing the Arab region" accelerated the formation of a new Cabinet on April 17.
The government included 11 newcomers but kept away Christian opponents and the Hezbollah militant group. Most Cabinet members are supporters or sympathizers of Syria, the main power broker in Lebanon.
France urges Syria to pull troops out of Lebanon
Reuters -- April 30
By Tom Heneghan
PARIS, April 30 - France urged Syria on Wednesday to withdraw all its troops from Lebanon, support the "road map" for Middle East peace and pressure radical Arab groups to end their campaigns of violence.
"We must seize this unique chance," he said in what appeared to be the clearest French statement to date of the need to end Syria's troop presence in Lebanon, a country Paris administered under a League of Nations mandate between the two world wars.
"Lebanon needs to return quickly...to full independence and sovereignty. The condition for this is the withdrawal of all foreign troops and the deployment of Lebanese forces on the border with Israel," Villepin said.
"Syria can make a gesture and continue the withdrawal already undertaken," he said, referring to the pullout in February of about 4,000 troops from northern Lebanon, the latest in a series of redeployments and withdrawals that reduced the number of Syrian troops in Lebanon to 16,000-17,000.
Syria poured thousands of troops into neighbouring Lebanon early in the 1975-1990 civil war to save Christian militias from defeat by Muslim, leftist and Palestinian forces. Damascus later turned on them when they sided with arch-foe Israel.
Lebanese Foreign Minister Jean Obeid said the Syrian presence, part of the 1989 Taif accords that helped end the country's civil war, was still needed.
"Lebanon considers this presence necessary, legal and temporary, and will work on this matter on that basis and in that spirit," he said in a statement.
[Sell out Hizbullah, get back the Golan?]
Powell Hopes Syria Will Rethink Its Policies
Reuters -- April 30
WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Colin Powell hopes to dissuade Syria from pursuing of weapons of mass destruction and supporting Hizbollah in south Lebanon in talks with President Bashar al-Assad on Saturday.
Testifying before a Senate subcommittee, Powell said he would make the case that the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq has dramatically changed circumstances in the Middle East and that Damascus should, as a result, rethink a range of policies.
He is expected to make a second trip to the region next week to meet Israelis and Palestinians to push the "road map" Middle East peace plan drafted by the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations.
"If Syria wants to be part of that comprehensive solution, then it has to review the policies it's been following with respect to the support of terrorist activities and the control they have over forces in Lebanon that present a threat to northern Israel," Powell said.
Kawaguchi asks Syria to improve relations with U.S.
Japan Today -- May 1
DAMASCUS — Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi met with Syrian President Bashar Assad on Wednesday and said Japan would welcome efforts by Syria to improve its relation with the United States, Japanese officials said.
Kawaguchi, who is in the Middle East on an eight-day trip, met Assad at his palace in Damascus. She expressed hope that Syria will improve its relationship with the U.S. when Secretary of State Colin Powell visits Syria in early May. (Kyodo News)
U.S. Says Libya, Syria Reduce Support for Terrorism
Reuters -- April 30
By Arshad Mohammed
WASHINGTON - The United States said on Wednesday Syria and Libya reduced their support for "terrorism" they remained on a U.S. list of seven "state sponsors of terrorism" along with Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea and Sudan.
'Shaming effect' on Arab world
The Washington Times -- April 29
By Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, a key architect of President Bush's Iraq policy, said yesterday that the ouster of Saddam Hussein has had a "shaming effect" on the Arab and Muslim world where other tyrannical rulers exist.
"In terms of the larger picture, I think they're like several other countries on a sort of dead-end course," he said. "They're less immediately threatening to us than some of those countries, but I think they're going to have to face that opportunity."
Mr. Wolfowitz said he believes Damascus facilitated the flow of hundreds of foreign guerrillas into Iraq before and during the war.
"There's no question that paramilitaries crossed the border, and it's a pretty tightly controlled border, so I have to assume they had some degree of official sanction," he said. "That's why we expressed very strong concern about what was going on."
But since the fall of Baghdad, the Syrians appear to have stopped more paramilitary fighters from getting into Iraq. "There does seem to be a change in that respect," he said.
But the fact that Syria "should have had an indulgence in sending killers into Iraq to threaten our people, that was simply unacceptable," Mr. Wolfowitz said.
Asked whether Syria is showing signs of political reform, like Iran, Mr. Wolfowitz said Iran tolerates more diversity of opinion.
"Oddly, in a certain way Iran is a more dangerous country in some of its policies," Mr. Wolfowitz said. "But it's a more open country in terms of the degree of diversion of opinion that's possible inside Iran."
"Syria's a pretty tightly regimented place and less obviously open to political change," he said.
"But that doesn't mean it can't change. In this modern world no country is immune, except maybe North Korea, to information from the outside. And when I spoke earlier for the need for Syria to confront the dead-end that it's on, there probably are people within that regime who can understand that they're on a dead-end course. Whether they can persuade President [Bashar] Assad to change it is a different matter."