War (of Words) with Syria
View current page...more recent posts
Tuesday, May 13, 2003
Iran, Syria, Lebanon all shun confrontation: Lebanese PM
AFP via IranMania -- May 13
BEIRUT - Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri said after talks Monday with Iran's President Mohammad Khatami that Beirut, Tehran and Damascus all shunned confrontation in the Middle East and sought a global settlement
"And I think that cooperation among the moderate countries will lead towards a better situation in the region," he said. "Khatami represents moderation in the Muslim world."
On the issue of US pressure on Lebanon and its ally Syria to disarm the Lebanese Shiite Muslim fundamentalist militia Hezbollah, Hariri said the focus should be on finding a comprehensive settlement in the Middle East.
U.S. troops reopen Iraqi border crossing with Syria, general says
AP via San Jose Mercury News -- May 13
MATT KELLEY
WASHINGTON - U.S. forces on Tuesday reopened a border crossing between Iraq and Syria, the commander of the Army's 101st Airborne Division said.
Maj. Gen. David Petraeus said his forces, based in Fort Campbell, Ky., reopened a crossing near the northern city of Mosul "to trade in accordance with United Nations regulations." He was referring to remaining sanctions that ban shipments of weapons and other restricted material to Iraq.
[Most of the interview was concerning Israel-Palestine issues, but the following except covered Syria.]
Powell Interview with Israeli Television Channel 2 on May 12
US Department of State -- May 13
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, last week you said that President Assad of
Syria lied to you. What makes you believe that he doesn't do it again,
especially after an interview to Newsweek when he said that he is not
going to close the terror organization offices, and he's not going to
crack down on Hezbollah?
SECRETARY POWELL: He did mislead me once before. It is not a matter of
me believing him or not believing him now, it's a matter of what he
does. What I said to him very clearly is there are things that we
believe he should do if he wants a better relationship with the United
States, if he wants to play a helpful role in solving the crisis here
in the region, and frankly if he wants to have good relations with a
neighbor of his that will have a new government, a government that I
believe will be very pro-American, very pro-Western, and will not view
with favor any efforts on the part of Syria to either destabilize Iraq
or to continue its terrorist support activities in Israel and in the
territories.
So I believe that President Bashar al-Assad has every incentive to
respond to the issues that I put before him last weekend. If he
chooses not to respond, if he chooses to dissemble, if he chooses to
find excuses, then he will find that he is on the wrong side of
history. He will find that he will not have better relations with the
United States, and he can take his choice. Does he want to have good
relations with the United States? Or does he want to have good
relations with Hamas? His choice.
Hizbullah braces for America’s wrath
Politburo member expects no change in support
The Daily Star -- May 12
Alia Ibrahim
Hizbullah appears to be the main target of the United States in the Middle East, now that the regime of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has been toppled. It faces accusations of carrying out terrorist activities but insists it is a legitimate resistance group.
Ghaleb Abu Zeinab, a member of the party’s politburo, stressed that the resistance has two clear and simple aims, liberating the occupied lands and deterring Israel.
Speaking to The Daily Star, he was very firm in denying accusations that the party undertook terrorist activities during the 80s, including any involvement in Western hostage-taking and the bombing of the US Marine barracks.
He said that all those activities had taken place before 1985, the year when Hizbullah was officially formed, adding that this was a time when chaos had reigned in the country.
[How relations between the US and Iran may affect relations between Israel, Lebanon and Syria.]
US and Iran hold secret talks after 23 years of hostility
The Independent -- May 13
By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
The United States and Iran have held secret talks that could have an important bearing on the interlocking problems of Afghanistan, the future government of Iraq and the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Though Bush administration officials denied yesterday the dialogue could lead to a normalisation of relations, senior representatives of the two countries have had three rounds of talks this year.
The next session is due next week in Geneva – technically under the auspices of the United Nations, but in practice they are bilateral discussions between the Iranians and an American team led by Zalmay Khalilzad, President George Bush's special envoy for Afghanistan and Iraq.
The contacts were disclosed as the Iranian President, Mohammad Khatami, began a historic visit to Beirut. He was expected to make a nod in the direction of one important demand by Washington – for Hizbollah guerrillas, who operate from Lebanon and are backed by Tehran, to rein in attacks on Israeli-occupied territories.
In oblique confirmation of Iran's desire to lower the temperature with the US, Rafik al-Hariri, the Lebanese Prime Minister, declared after talks with Mr Khatami yesterday that neither wanted to inflame tensions in the region, and would press for a diplomatic solution. "We still have in Lebanon part of our land occupied, the Syrians have the Golan Heights. All these need to be solved," Mr Hariri said, referring to the Shebaa farms and to the territory Israel seized from Syria in the 1967 Middle East war.
[Exceprt from a review of "Water Wars: Drought, Flood, Folly, and the Politics of Thirst" by Diane Raines Ward.]
Water, water everywhere, but too few drops for all
The Sun -- May 11
It's easy to believe, for instance, that the tension in the Middle East is all about religion and nationalism. Take the Six-Day War of 1967. According to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, "In reality, it started two-and-a-half years earlier, on the day Israel decided to act against the diversion of the Jordan [River]."
Israel, through the canals and pipes of its National Water Carrier, had been diverting water from the Jordan River to deliver water to its people. The Jordan has its source in several streams that originate in Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. Arab League leaders, angered by the water diversion downstream, decided to do their own diversion upstream.
Israel warned its neighbors that if they tried to cut off any of the water supply there would be hell to pay. They did, and there was. Israel bombed water projects on the Hasbani and Wazzani rivers in Lebanon and the Yarmouk River dam in Syria, then annexed the Golan Heights, thus ensuring control of the Jordan River's headwaters.
After war, Syria speeds reforms
The Washington Post via MSNBC -- May 12
By Alan Sipress
DAMASCUS, Syria — For more than 20 years, Syrian boys and girls have worn military-style school uniforms, olive green with stripes on their epaulets to signify their grade and caps to match.
[Another Commonwealth Club speaker.]
ISRAEL'S CURRENT SECURITY CHALLENGES: AN INSIDER'S VIEW OF ISRAELI STRATEGIC THINKING
MONDAY MAY 19 | INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
ARIEH O'SULLIVAN, Military Correspondent, The Jerusalem Post
How will Israel face the impact of American action in the new Middle East? O'Sullivan has covered the Israeli defense establishment for 13 years and will examine its options regarding the Palestinians, Iraq, and the strategic relationship with the United States.
[Commonwealth Club, the nation's largest and oldest public affairs forum, hosts a speaker who will discuss Hezbollah.]
HIZBOLLAH: THE NEW POLITICAL/MILITARY MODEL
DWIGHT JAMES SIMPSON, Ph.D., Professor of International Relations, San Francisco State University
Hizbollah is an active political party in Lebanon, with elected representation in the Lebanese Parliament. Its military wing engaged Israeli occupation forces and the Israeli-sponsored South Lebanese Army, both of whom withdrew from Lebanese territory. Simpson's analysis of Hizbollah is based on extensive field experience throughout the Middle East, including a rare interview with Hizbollah leader Sheikh Nasrallah.
via SF Indymedia announcement of this talk, followed by a trail of comments, including wisenheimer remarks by the editor of this page.
[Firecrackers at picnic spark international incident.]
Lebanon denies bomb thrown at Israeli town; Hezbollah ready to confront attack
AP via Ha'aretz -- May 12
BEIRUT - Lebanon yesterday denied reports that an explosive charge was thrown at an Israeli settlement from its territory, while a high ranking Hezbollah official said the guerrilla group was ready to confront any possible Israeli attack on Lebanon.
A Lebanese security official said in a statement obtained by The Associated Press that Israeli media outlets had erroneously reported that Lebanese youths had "thrown an explosive charge across the border" toward an Israeli settlement near the southern Lebanese town of Marwahin.
The statement said "picnicking youths (had thrown)... firecrackers at the mentioned area."