Cate Blanchett will play
Bob Dylan in his "androgenous phase" in a [tod haynes] biopic of the great poet-songwriter's life, it was announced, as Dylan turned 65.
had some blueberry infused mead (in honor of beowulf) yesterday at
spuyten duyvil in williamsburg. little bit of a hole in the wall but has a garden out back and a great beer selection.
Winelog. Haven't had a chance to look too closely at this, but might be interesting. Seems like a moderated group wine tasting wiki type thing behind a modern web 2.0 interface.
"say, [fill in secretaries name here] does our
HR have a bloging policy?"
The Tom DeLay Legal Expense Trust
is currently featuring a Stephen Colbert clip on the front page of their website in which Colbert "defends" Tom DeLay. QED. LOL.
tom moody or
kenny scharf on the wall / found on curbed. looks like a ks.
"Every war becomes a proving ground for new tactics and new technologies. Battleships rose to prominence in World War I; tanks and bombers determined the course of World War II; Vietnam brought air power definitively into the Jet Age. The current conflict is no different. The Pentagon began this war believing its new, networked technologies would help make U.S. ground forces practically unstoppable in Iraq. Slow-moving, unwired armies like Saddam Hussein’s were the kind of foe network-centric warriors were designed to carve up quickly. During the invasion in March 2003, that proved to be largely the case—despite most of the soldiers not being wired up at all. It was enough that their commanders had systems like BFT, which let them march to Baghdad faster than anyone imagined possible, with half the troops it took to fight the Gulf War in 1991. But now, more than three years into sectarian conflict and a violent insurgency that has cost nearly 2,400 American lives, an investigation of the current state of network-centric warfare reveals that frontline troops have a critical need for networked gear—gear that hasn’t come yet. “There is a connectivity gap,” states a recent Army War College report. “Information is not reaching the lowest levels.”"
the
history channel in running da vinci code related programing this week. last night they ran a great my
steries of the freemasons doc that was awesome and will be replayed saturday 6pm. do i really need to see dc the movie? ive avoided the book pretty successfully.
hayden hearing on
wnyc.
likely on cspan as well but The Washington Notes steve clemons is supposed to appear on wnyc.
theres always a
defense contract lurking behind any bush foreign policy initiative.
Seems like most people don't trust Wayne Madsen. I don't know enough to judge, but it seems to me like he at least sometimes gets a scoop. Especially on insider DC stuff. Anyway, he says
tomorrow is Fitzmas.
I'm not saying I believe (or trust) her, but
this is interesting:
...Judy Miller tells Rory O'Connor and William Scott Malone about the story she'll regret for the rest of her life -- the fact that an anonymous White House source told her in July 2001 that an NSA intelligence report predicted a large al Qaeda attack, possibly on the continental United States...
Or maybe she'll just say anything to get back into the spotlight.
Ned Lamont commercials, the first featuring Kos.
Tom "
6 months" Friedman. LOL. (Did I get this from one of you? Sorry if it's a dupe.)
malcolm gladwell has a blog. does that mean weve reached a tipping point?
Comment of the Day -- on a thread about
conservative battle wanking fatigue
Son, we live in a world that has blogs, and those blogs have to be guarded by men with computers. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Waring? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Reynolds and you curse the Keyboarders. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Reynolds’ existence, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don’t want the truth because deep down, in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want me on that blog. You need me on that blog. We use words like “fisk,” “indeed,” “heh” … We use these words as the backbone to a life spent at home defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a woman who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the endlessly self-important invective that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it! I would rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a laptop and start to post. Either way, I don’t give a damn what you think you are entitled to!